CallCentreVoice Topic WFM Tool Cost

Created by:
Statistics:
Forum:
Quick links:

Louise Smith on 4/11/2009 14:42:03.
Topic has 3 posts; viewed 1213 times.
Planning, Strategy and Management   [This topic is read only]
Forum List | Unified View | Latest Posts
Popular Topics | Editor's Choice | Voices WebLog

Author

Comments

Louise Smith
Forecasting & Planning Project
HLIS

6 posts
0 friends welcomed

WFM Tool Cost  [4/11/2009 14:42:03]

Hi,

I have been undertaking a resource and planning project for the last nine months now and have built a number of staffing forecast models in excel for our different work flows.

I am now in a position where I would like to broach the subject with the company directors of purchasing a WFM tool like Q-max or Teleopti Both of which I have used with previous employers in the past), but before I do so I wondered if anyone had been involved with the purchase of anything similar recetly and could give me a rough estimation of the costs involved.

Thanks in advance

You don't have the priviledges to view this user's post history

 

Jason Dickson
Telemarketing Manager
CCT

388 posts
0 friends welcomed

WFM Tool Cost   [4/11/2009 16:32:35]

Hi Louise

CCT are a partner with both companies and would be happy to give you an idea of costings. It really would depend on the depth of product you require as to how much!

If you want to discuss this you can give me a call on 0117 311 5803.

Kind Regards
Jason

Gold Level MemberYou don't have the priviledges to view this user's post history

 

Karen Thompson
Call Centre Manager
Lakeland Electric

1 posts
0 friends welcomed

WFM Tool Cost  [10/11/2009 17:08:38]

Hi Louise:

At Lakeland Electric, we recently purchased a WFM system by RFP. It is a great way to get vendors to compete for your attention, pitch the lowest possible price and give full disclosure about what features they do and do not offer.

As a public utility, it is a legal requirement that the winning bid contract terms and pricing are is published in full.

http://www.lakelandgov.net/agendas/09-08-09/X-C%20-%20StratasoftSoftwareK.pdf

The vendor’s don’t particularly like the publication of their contract -- but it’s a bonus to prospective buyers.

Reviewing one of these disclosures is a great way for prospective buyers to gauge the going rate after someone else has done the hard work of making the vendors compete with each other. Don’t forget that you can continue to negotiate with the winning bidder to get more of what you want. In our case the proposed contract was very favorable in that we got a perpetual license and many other entitlements that we thought we were going to have to fight for. Even still we asked for and received concessions in the area of the annual maintenance rate and staging the purchase.

My advice is to ask for the maximum number of licenses you think you’ll ever need. This will give you the best volume discount. Once a bidder wins the RFP, ask to purchase the licenses in stages.

Building the RFP is critical. We asked for a lot of detail on available features and made the important ones mandatory. For example we asked for evidence that the system could generate consistent schedules as we know that random schedules are a big problem with many systems. Correctly interpreting long calls that last longer than a planning interval was another mandatory. We also wanted the ability to annotate historical call spikes.

In addition to the specialty requirements above, we also asked for the full spectrum of features that are offered by most WFM Vendors. This included shift trading, vacation bidding, vacation accrual, real time & historical adherence, forecast tuning tools, seasonalization, payroll reconciliation, performance measurement, reporting, schedule re-optimization, exception tracking, etc.

Vendors tend to put a lot of screen captures in an RFP responses to demonstrate compliance. Reviewing a good RFP response gives the buyer a good sense for how feature rich and user friendly a WFM solution will be.

We also made it mandatory that the system be fully web based and available on premise. Web based solutions that were only available hosted were excluded from bidding.

Finally, we asked for references as part of the RFP and verified them prior to signing.

The RFP process worked out well for us because we got everything we wanted and more for a great price.

Thanks, Karen

You don't have the priviledges to view this user's post history

 
  

In Read Only View, you cannot reply to any topic